Once friends and business partners, and now rivals, Elon Musk and Sam Altman are dueling it out in a California federal courtroom. Their personal animus may impact the course of generative AI model development,

New filings in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI show two top tech investors back his allegation that the ChatGPT developer sought to unfairly quash competition.

Encode, a nonprofit AI safety org, has requested permission to file an amicus brief in support of Elon Musk's injunction to halt OpenAI's transition to a for-profit.

A story of control and competition unfolds, with the ongoing feud between OpenAI co-founders, Elon Musk and Sam Altman. What's the future of ChatGPT, inside the conflict?

Encode, a nonprofit organization that co-sponsored California’s failed SB 1047 AI safety legislation, is joining forces with Elon Musk to oppose OpenAI’s plan to repivot as a fully for-profit company.

The youth advocacy group Encode is supporting Musk's lawsuit seeking a preliminary injunction that would stop OpenAI from becoming fully for-profit.

OpenAI has rejected Musk’s lawsuit, arguing that he lacks standing and is using the case to benefit his AI company, xAI. OpenAI also released internal communications showing that Musk had advocated for converting the organization to a for-profit model in 2017.

Hinton has also criticised OpenAI cofounder Sam Altman, saying he is “much less concerned with safety than with profits,” and calling this, “unfortunate”